Placing staff under permanent surveillance is in general an excessive interference with their rights. Exceptions are limited to cases justified by the nature of the task where the device does not serve to watch how staff perform (for example permanent geolocation of an emergency vehicle so the nearest crew can be dispatched).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.