C5 (Germany) C5-OPS-20: Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 43 controls across 28 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 4 controls

161R1-IR-3 Incident Response Testing
161R1-IR-5 Incident Monitoring
161R1-PM-14 Testing, Training, and Monitoring
161R1-PM-6 Measures of Performance

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 3 controls

CCM-AIS-03 Application Security Metrics
CCM-SEF-05 Incident Response Metrics
CCM-TVM-10 Vulnerability Management Metrics

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
SOC2-CC7.5 CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

CPS234-22 Systematic Control Testing Program
CPS234-P31 Annual Review of Testing Program Sufficiency

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 2 controls

CFTC-SS-16 Security Incident Response Plan and Testing
CFTC-SS-36 Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-16.3 Perform Root Cause Analysis on Security Vulnerabilities
CIS-18.4 Validate Security Measures

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
SI-2(3) Flaw Remediation | Time to Remediate Flaws and Benchmarks for Corrective Actions (SI-2(3))

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
SI-2(3) Flaw Remediation | Time to Remediate Flaws and Benchmarks for Corrective Actions (SI-2(3))

NIS2 Directive · 2 controls

Art.21.2.f Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of the cybersecurity risk-management measures
Art.21.4 Take corrective measures without undue delay on finding that the measures are not met

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-PM-6 PM-6 Measures of Performance

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System · 1 control

CBPR-PR-33 Testing the effectiveness of safeguards

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 1 control

CPS230-P30 Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC10-BP08 Establish a framework for learning from incidents

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-STEP4 Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-IR-3 Detection and analysis - create incidents based on high-quality alerts

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

CA.L2-3.12.3 Security Control Monitoring

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.24 General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

GDPR · 1 control

GDPR-Art.32 Security of processing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

5.27 Learning from information security incidents

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.12.03 Continuous Monitoring

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.5e Assess Effectiveness of Security Solutions

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

SP800-218-RV.3.3 Review SDLC to Prevent Recurrence

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.4.2 12.4.2 Quarterly reviews that personnel follow security procedures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-OPS-20 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free