DORA
DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing

DORA DORA-Art.24: General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

Financial entities shall establish, maintain and review a sound and comprehensive digital operational resilience testing programme as an integral part of the ICT risk management framework, following a risk-based approach.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 39 controls across 17 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 4 controls

  • CA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • IR-3 Incident Response Testing

FedRAMP Moderate · 4 controls

  • CA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • IR-3 Incident Response Testing

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

  • CIS-17.7 Conduct Routine Incident Response Exercises
  • CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
  • CIS-18.4 Validate Security Measures

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

EU AI Act · 2 controls

  • EUAI-Art.17 Quality management system
  • EUAI-Art.72 Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01 Improvements are identified from evaluations
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures

GDPR · 1 control

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.21.2.f Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of the cybersecurity risk-management measures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing

You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?

DORA DORA-Art.24 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 39 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.