Give the cloud customer, so far as the service model permits, the means to monitor and steer the system resources allocated to it, so the customer can prevent resource contention and sustain adequate performance.
This control maps to 12 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
C5 (Germany) C5-OPS-03 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 12 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.