FedRAMP High SI-2(3): Flaw Remediation | Time to Remediate Flaws and Benchmarks for Corrective Actions. (a) Measure the time between flaw identification and flaw remediation; and (b) Establish the following benchmarks for taking corrective actions: [Assignment: organization-defined
Flaw Remediation | Time to Remediate Flaws and Benchmarks for Corrective Actions. (a) Measure the time between flaw identification and flaw remediation; and (b) Establish the following benchmarks for taking corrective actions: [Assignment: organization-defined
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 23 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
6.3.1 Security vulnerabilities are identified and managed as follows: • New security vulnerabilities are identified using industry-recognized sources for security vulnerability information, including alerts from international and national computer emergency response teams (CERTs). • Vulnerabilities
6.3.3 All system components are protected from known vulnerabilities by installing applicable security patches/updates as follows: • Patches/updates for critical vulnerabilities (identified according to the risk ranking process at Requirement 6.3.1) are installed within one
You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?
FedRAMP High SI-2(3) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.