Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-SEF-05: Incident Response Metrics

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 26 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08 An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 3 controls

161R1-IR-5 Incident Monitoring
161R1-PM-27 Privacy Reporting
161R1-PM-6 Measures of Performance

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-IR-3 Detection and analysis - create incidents based on high-quality alerts
ASBv3-IR-7 Post-incident activity - conduct lesson learned and retain evidence

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures
C5-SIM-05 Evaluation and learning process

DORA · 2 controls

DORA-Art.13 Learning and evolving
DORA-Art.18 Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-IR-5 IR-5 Incident Monitoring
NIST800-PM-6 PM-6 Measures of Performance

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 1 control

CPS230-27 Identification and Escalation of Incidents and Near Misses

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC10-BP08 Establish a framework for learning from incidents

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

IR.L2-3.6.2 Incident Reporting

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.1 · 1 control

SEF-05 Incident Response Metrics

FedRAMP High · 1 control

IR-5 Incident Monitoring

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

5.27 Learning from information security incidents

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

5.27 Learning from information security incidents

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.10.6 12.10.6 Plan evolved from lessons learned and industry developments

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC7.5 CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 have you already done?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-SEF-05 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 140 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 571.1% covered · 57 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate60.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.060.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)58.4% covered · 82 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 12 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free