NIST SP 800-218 SP800-218-RV.3.3: Review SDLC to Prevent Recurrence

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 24 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 3 controls

10.1 Continual improvement
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
8.3 AI risk treatment

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures
C5-SP-02 Review and Approval of Policies and Instructions

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process
CIS-16.3 Perform Root Cause Analysis on Security Vulnerabilities

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-AIS-01 Application and Interface Security Policy and Procedures
CCM-GRC-03 Organizational Policy Reviews

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.27 Learning from information security incidents
8.25 Secure development life cycle

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.27 Learning from information security incidents
8.25 Secure development life cycle

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-PM-6 Measures of Performance
161R1-SA-3 System Development Life Cycle

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-SA-15 SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools
NIST800-SA-3 SA-3 System Development Life Cycle

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC10-BP08 Establish a framework for learning from incidents

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-GS-10 Define and implement DevOps security strategy

FedRAMP High · 1 control

SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools (SA-15)

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools (SA-15)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.5e Assess Effectiveness of Security Solutions

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-218 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-218 SP800-218-RV.3.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-218 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 30 of 42 NIST SP 800-218 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 571.4% covered · 12 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)61.9% covered · 16 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-161 Rev 161.9% covered · 16 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.152.4% covered · 20 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202252.4% covered · 20 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark50% covered · 21 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free