Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-IR-3: Detection and analysis - create incidents based on high-quality alerts

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 42 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

C5 (Germany) · 4 controls

C5-OPS-13 Logging and Monitoring - Identification of Events
C5-OPS-16 Logging and Monitoring - Configuration
C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures
C5-SIM-05 Evaluation and learning process

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 4 controls

CCM-LOG-05 Audit Logs Monitoring and Response
CCM-LOG-13 Failures and Anomalies Reporting
CCM-SEF-05 Incident Response Metrics
CCM-SEF-06 Event Triage Processes

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08 Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-02 Incident reports are triaged and validated

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-AU-6 AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
NIST800-IR-5 IR-5 Incident Monitoring
NIST800-SI-4 SI-4 System Monitoring

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

10.4.3 10.4.3 Exceptions and anomalies from log review addressed
10.7.2 10.7.2 Detect and alert on critical security control failures
12.10.5 12.10.5 Plan covers alerts from security monitoring systems

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-13.11 Tune Security Event Alerting Thresholds
CIS-17.9 Establish and Maintain Security Incident Thresholds

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

AU.L2-3.3.5 Audit Correlation
SI.L2-3.14.6 Monitor Communications for Attacks

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

IR-5 Incident Monitoring
SI-4(5) System-Generated Alerts

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

IR-5 Incident Monitoring
SI-4(5) System-Generated Alerts

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
8.16 Monitoring activities

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.03.05 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
03.06.02 Incident Monitoring, Reporting, and Response Assistance

NIST SP 800-172 · 2 controls

3.11.3e Advanced Automation and Analytics Capabilities
3.6.1e Establish Security Operations Center (SOC)

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System · 1 control

CBPR-PR-33 Testing the effectiveness of safeguards

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 1 control

CPS230-27 Identification and Escalation of Incidents and Near Misses

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-30 Detection and Response Mechanisms

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-28 Continuous incident detection and response (Excellent)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC04-BP03 Correlate and enrich security alerts

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-16 Security Incident Response Plan and Testing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SI-4 System Monitoring

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC7.3 CC7.3 Evaluating security events to identify incidents

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-IR-3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free