Cross-Framework Mapping

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)vsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)

See exactly how Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls map to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) maps to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation and Governance(3 mappings)

IG-4Incident Response3 targets
GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
GP 21External Communication

Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification3 targets
GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
GP 21External Communication
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment3 targets
GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
GP 21External Communication

Related Comparisons

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

Other UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) has 31 controls across its framework, while UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 11 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

Of 31 total Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls, 3 map directly to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

28 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct equivalent in UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.