TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 43% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Facility Security Assessment and Planning(3 mappings)

33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security

Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel(3 mappings)

CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management

Cybersecurity Plan Requirements(5 mappings)

CYB-2Account Security Measures2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management

Incident Reporting and Monitoring(4 mappings)

IR-2Incident Documentation3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
IR-4Continuous Monitoring
→NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls

Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements(2 mappings)

VES-3Penetration Testing2 targets
→NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management

Related Comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 59 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs FedRAMP Rev 59 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20249 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges9 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 21 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements, where 3 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 21 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 9 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

12 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.