TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 43% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Facility Security Assessment and Planning(9 mappings)

33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment3 targets
→NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
→NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
→NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)3 targets
→NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
→NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
→NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP3 targets
→NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
→NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
→NIST800-PE-3Physical access control

Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel(3 mappings)

CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises3 targets
→NIST800-IR-2Incident response training
→NIST800-IR-5Incident monitoring
→NIST800-IR-7Incident response assistance

Cybersecurity Plan Requirements(8 mappings)

CYB-2Account Security Measures3 targets
→NIST800-IA-4Identifier management
→NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication
→NIST800-IA-8Identification and authentication of non-organizational users
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan5 targets
→NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution
→NIST800-CP-9System backup
→NIST800-IR-2Incident response training
→NIST800-IR-5Incident monitoring
→NIST800-IR-7Incident response assistance

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs FedRAMP Rev 59 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20249 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)9 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges9 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 536 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 21 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 172 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements, where 3 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 21 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 9 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

12 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.