Cross-Framework Mapping

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards RulevsFATF 40 Recommendations

See exactly how US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls map to FATF 40 Recommendations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule maps to FATF 40 Recommendations with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)

314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
FATF-R11Record Keeping
NYDFS-500.14Monitoring and Logging
FATF-R11Record Keeping

Applicability to Higher Education(4 mappings)

HE-1Financial institution status of higher education3 targets
FATF-R10Customer Due Diligence
FATF-R20Reporting of Suspicious Transactions
FATF-R21Tipping-Off and Confidentiality
HE-3FSA compliance requirements
FATF-R14Money or Value Transfer Services

Related Comparisons

Other US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule comparisons

Other FATF 40 Recommendations comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and FATF 40 Recommendations?

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule has 41 controls across its framework, while FATF 40 Recommendations covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative Safeguards, where 14 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls have no direct FATF 40 Recommendations equivalent.

How many controls map between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and FATF 40 Recommendations?

Of 41 total US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls, 4 map directly to FATF 40 Recommendations controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule to FATF 40 Recommendations?

37 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls have no direct equivalent in FATF 40 Recommendations. The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative Safeguards with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and FATF 40 Recommendations?

The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative Safeguards (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.