Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token ProvisionsvsFATF 40 Recommendations
See exactly how Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions controls map to FATF 40 Recommendations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions maps to FATF 40 Recommendations with 13% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supervision and Enforcement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Supervision and Enforcement(3 mappings)
DPT Service Definitions and Scope(3 mappings)
AML/CFT Obligations for DPT Providers(3 mappings)
Consumer Protection for DPT Services(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions comparisons
Other FATF 40 Recommendations comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions and FATF 40 Recommendations?
Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions has 31 controls across its framework, while FATF 40 Recommendations covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supervision and Enforcement, where 13 Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions controls have no direct FATF 40 Recommendations equivalent.
How many controls map between Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions and FATF 40 Recommendations?
Of 31 total Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions controls, 4 map directly to FATF 40 Recommendations controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions to FATF 40 Recommendations?
27 Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions controls have no direct equivalent in FATF 40 Recommendations. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supervision and Enforcement with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Provisions and FATF 40 Recommendations?
The domain with the highest gap count is Supervision and Enforcement (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.