Cross-Framework Mapping

UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)vsEquator Principles (EP4, 2020)

See exactly how UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls map to Equator Principles (EP4, 2020). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) maps to Equator Principles (EP4, 2020) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Pillar II - Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Principles 11-24).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Due Diligence(2 mappings)

UNGP-17Human Rights Due Diligence
EP4-P2Environmental and Social Assessment
UNGP-18Assessing Actual and Potential Impacts
EP4-P2Environmental and Social Assessment

Access to Remedy(2 mappings)

UNGP-29Operational Level Grievance Mechanisms
EP4-P6Grievance Mechanism
UNGP-31Effectiveness Criteria for Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms
EP4-P6Grievance Mechanism

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and Equator Principles (EP4, 2020)?

UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) has 42 controls across its framework, while Equator Principles (EP4, 2020) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Pillar II - Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Principles 11-24), where 9 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls have no direct Equator Principles (EP4, 2020) equivalent.

How many controls map between UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and Equator Principles (EP4, 2020)?

Of 42 total UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls, 4 map directly to Equator Principles (EP4, 2020) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) to Equator Principles (EP4, 2020)?

38 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls have no direct equivalent in Equator Principles (EP4, 2020). The highest concentration of gaps is in Pillar II - Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Principles 11-24) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and Equator Principles (EP4, 2020)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Pillar II - Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Principles 11-24) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.