UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments
See exactly how UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 32% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 76 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 76 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Supply Chain Security(20 mappings)
+40 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 comparisons
Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 has 76 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 24 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
Of 76 total UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls, 24 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
52 UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.