Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Modern Slavery Act 2015vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Enforcement and Penalties(10 mappings)

BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition3 targets
FTC-314.1Purpose and Scope
FTC-314.3Information Security Program Standards
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers2 targets
FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection

Anti-Slavery Commissioner and Governance(1 mappings)

s.42Commissioner's Annual Report
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Transparency in Supply Chains(4 mappings)

s.54(5)Statement Content Requirements4 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

Related Comparisons

Other UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 comparisons

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 has 48 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 22 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 48 total UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls, 7 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

41 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.