UK Modern Slavery Act 2015vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Enforcement and Penalties(12 mappings)
Anti-Slavery Commissioner and Governance(1 mappings)
Transparency in Supply Chains(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 has 48 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 22 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 48 total UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls, 7 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
41 UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.