TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk ManagementvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 58% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management Lifecycle(3 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-RM-03Continuous Monitoring3 targets
→FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-02Lloyd's Incident Reporting
→Sec. 314.4(d)Regular testing and monitoring

Security Controls(17 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue4 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management7 targets
→FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
→FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection3 targets
→Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information
→Sec. 314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management comparisons

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FedRAMP Rev 517 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs South Korea ISMS-P17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)16 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges16 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management has 24 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 8 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 24 total Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls, 14 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

10 Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.