UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience FrameworkvsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)
See exactly how UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls map to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework maps to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) with 25% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance and Self-Assessment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Impact Tolerances(3 mappings)
Ongoing Compliance(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons
Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?
UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework has 20 controls across its framework, while Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance and Self-Assessment, where 4 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) equivalent.
How many controls map between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?
Of 20 total UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls, 5 map directly to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?
15 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct equivalent in Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance and Self-Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Governance and Self-Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.