Cross-Framework Mapping

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience FrameworkvsISO 30401

See exactly how UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls map to ISO 30401. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework maps to ISO 30401 with 20% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 5 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 5 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Third-Party(1 mappings)

UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk
ISO30401-15Nonconformity and corrective action

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and ISO 30401?

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework has 5 controls across its framework, while ISO 30401 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident, where 1 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct ISO 30401 equivalent.

How many controls map between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and ISO 30401?

Of 5 total UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls, 1 map directly to ISO 30401 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to ISO 30401?

4 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 30401. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and ISO 30401?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.