TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and CompetencevsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification

See exactly how ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls map to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
72
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence maps to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification with 6% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 77 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls identifies 72 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 77 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Resource Requirements(4 mappings)

6.4Logging and Monitoring
→SIGSTORE-2Transparency Log (Rekor) and Verification
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
→SIGSTORE-2Transparency Log (Rekor) and Verification
6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
→SIGSTORE-3Sigstore for Containers and Artifacts (Cosign)
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up
→SIGSTORE-3Sigstore for Containers and Artifacts (Cosign)

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(1 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.2Personnel
→SIGSTORE-2Transparency Log (Rekor) and Verification

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration31 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products17 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories17 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 914 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System14 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201714 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System13 mappings

Other Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons

APPI vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence has 77 controls across its framework, while Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

Of 77 total ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls, 5 map directly to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

72 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct equivalent in Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.