UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence SuppliersvsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)
See exactly how UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls map to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers maps to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) with 71% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Objective A: Managing Security Risk(12 mappings)
Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack(8 mappings)
+16 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons
Other New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers has 21 controls across its framework, while New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (71% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance, where 2 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
Of 21 total UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls, 15 map directly to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls — representing 71% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers to New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
6 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct equivalent in New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.