TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat FrameworkvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 15% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance and Collective Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Ground Segment Threats(4 mappings)

GT-2Physical Security Threats
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
GT-3Supply Chain Compromise3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk

Threat Intelligence Sharing(2 mappings)

TI-3Indicator of Compromise Sharing2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

Related Comparisons

Other Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework comparisons

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs ISO 27001:20224 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)3 mappingsSpace ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework vs ITU Radio Regulations and Space Security Standards3 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework has 20 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance and Collective Security, where 4 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 20 total Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls, 3 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

17 Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance and Collective Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Space ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) — Threat Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance and Collective Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.