Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsUK Open Banking Standard

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to UK Open Banking Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to UK Open Banking Standard with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 19 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Personal Information Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Access Control(3 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
OB-CX.3Strong Customer Authentication
OB-DIR.1Open Banking Directory
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management

Personal Information Protection(2 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
OB-CX.2Granular Consent Management
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
OB-CX.2Granular Consent Management

System and Operations Security(5 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation3 targets
OB-CX.2Granular Consent Management
OB-SEC.2Transport Layer Security
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
OB-OPS.4Incident Management
Coverage crosswalk

A South Korea ISMS-P to UK Open Banking Standard crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which UK Open Banking Standard controls your existing South Korea ISMS-P work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

South Korea ISMS-P into UK Open Banking Standard
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

UK Open Banking Standard into South Korea ISMS-P
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

South Korea ISMS-P to UK Open Banking Standard (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 24% in the header counts how many South Korea ISMS-P controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many UK Open Banking Standard controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and UK Open Banking Standard?

South Korea ISMS-P has 25 controls across its framework, while UK Open Banking Standard covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Protection, where 4 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct UK Open Banking Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and UK Open Banking Standard?

Of 25 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 6 map directly to UK Open Banking Standard controls, representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to UK Open Banking Standard?

19 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in UK Open Banking Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Protection with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and UK Open Banking Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Protection (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.