Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsUK Open Banking Standard

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to UK Open Banking Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to UK Open Banking Standard with 25% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(6 mappings)

FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
OB-OPS.4Incident Management
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
OB-OPS.4Incident Management
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery2 targets
OB-API.4MI Reporting Specification
OB-OPS.1API Availability Requirements
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
OB-CX.2Granular Consent Management
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
OB-OPS.4Incident Management

Purpose, Scope and Definitions(3 mappings)

Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards
Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information2 targets
OB-CX.2Granular Consent Management
OB-OPS.2Performance Standards

Safeguard Elements(5 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information2 targets
OB-SEC.2Transport Layer Security
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management
Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication3 targets
OB-CX.3Strong Customer Authentication
OB-DIR.1Open Banking Directory
OB-SEC.4Certificate Management

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other UK Open Banking Standard comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Open Banking Standard?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while UK Open Banking Standard covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct UK Open Banking Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Open Banking Standard?

Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 9 map directly to UK Open Banking Standard controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to UK Open Banking Standard?

27 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Open Banking Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and UK Open Banking Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.