TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsSOC 2

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to SOC 2 with 22% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Protection Measures - Access Control and Authentication(3 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

Personal Information Processing(8 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction2 targets
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Protection Measures - System and Data Security(9 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery2 targets
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST Privacy Framework14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs MTCS (Singapore)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ISO 27001:202213 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements13 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 239 mappingsAICPA SOC 3 vs SOC 231 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs SOC 222 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 212 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs SOC 211 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs SOC 211 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs SOC 29 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and SOC 2?

South Korea ISMS-P has 40 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy, where 5 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and SOC 2?

Of 40 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 9 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to SOC 2?

31 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.