TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsSOC 2

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to SOC 2 with 25% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(6 mappings)

27011-1Scope2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
27011-3Terms and definitions2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
27400-3Terms and definitions2 targets
→SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

Risk(1 mappings)

27400-5.2IoT Risk Assessment
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(4 mappings)

27400-5.2IoT Risk Assessment
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
27400-5.4Data and privacy risks3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed

Device(2 mappings)

27400-6.1Secure Device Design2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(4 mappings)

27400-6.1Secure Device Design2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(3 mappings)

27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)11 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Azure Security Benchmark11 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202410 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA)10 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Nebraska Data Privacy Act10 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)10 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 239 mappingsAICPA SOC 3 vs SOC 231 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs SOC 222 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 212 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs SOC 211 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs SOC 211 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs SOC 210 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and SOC 2?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and SOC 2?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 10 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to SOC 2?

32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.