Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
65%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 65% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Management System Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protection Measures — Access Control and Authentication(9 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy4 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
ISMSP-AC-02User Account Management
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
ISO27001-A.8.5Strong authentication mechanisms
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties

Personal Information Processing(6 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance

Protection Measures — System and Data Security(5 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management
ISO27001-A.8.9Secure baseline configuration management
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management2 targets
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring
ISO27001-A.8.15Audit trail and event logging

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27001:2022?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 95 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (65% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Management System Requirements, where 4 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 13 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 65% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to ISO 27001:2022?

7 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Management System Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Management System Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.