Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)vsISO/IEC 27400:2022

See exactly how South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 27% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue3 targets
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security2 targets
27400-5.2IoT Risk Assessment
27400-5.2IoT Risk Assessment
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline2 targets
27400-5.4Data and privacy risks
27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection2 targets
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification2 targets
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs3 targets
27011-1Scope
27011-3Terms and definitions
27400-3Terms and definitions
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management2 targets
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls3 targets
27400-6.3Secure Update Mechanism
27400-6.3Secure Update Mechanism
27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) has 48 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 9 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

Of 48 total South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls, 13 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

35 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.