TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsISO/IEC 27400:2022

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
75
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 18% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 78 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(7 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
→27400-6.1Device identity and authentication
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards2 targets
→27400-5.4Data and privacy risks
→27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation
ISO27001-A.5.7Cyber threat intelligence gathering
→27400-5.1IoT-specific threat landscape

A.7 Physical Controls(3 mappings)

ISO27001-A.7.1Defined secure zones and boundaries
→27400-5.2Device-level risks
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring2 targets
→27400-5.2Device-level risks
→27400-6.5Security monitoring and incident response

A.8 Technological Controls(10 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.11Sensitive data obfuscation techniques2 targets
→27400-7.1Data protection and privacy measures
→27400-7.4Data retention and deletion
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
→27400-6.1Device identity and authentication
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
→27400-6.1Device identity and authentication
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
→27400-6.2Secure communication
ISO27001-A.8.25Security-integrated development lifecycle
→27400-6.3Software and firmware security
ISO27001-A.8.26Application-level security requirements
→27400-6.3Software and firmware security
ISO27001-A.8.29Security validation in development and acceptance
→27400-6.3Software and firmware security
ISO27001-A.8.5Strong authentication mechanisms
→27400-6.1Device identity and authentication
ISO27001-A.8.9Secure baseline configuration management
→27400-6.4Secure configuration and hardening

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs CSA CCM v430 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange26 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)24 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements23 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ISO/IEC 27400:202213 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO/IEC 27400:202212 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs ISO/IEC 27400:202212 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs ISO/IEC 27400:202212 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs ISO/IEC 27400:202211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 33 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 17 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 78 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

78 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.