Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)vsIRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)

See exactly how South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls map to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) maps to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Certification and Compliance(3 mappings)

CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA3 targets
IRM-FR-2Credit and Liquidity Risk
IRM-KR-2Information and Data Risk
IRM-SR-1Strategic Risk Assessment

Security Controls(13 mappings)

KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
IRM-RP-1Risk Identification
IRM-RP-2Risk Analysis and Evaluation
IRM-SR-1Strategic Risk Assessment
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs
IRM-OR-3Supply Chain and Technology Risk
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management5 targets
IRM-RP-1Risk Identification
IRM-RP-2Risk Analysis and Evaluation
IRM-RP-3Risk Treatment and Reporting
IRM-RP-4Monitoring and Review
IRM-SR-1Strategic Risk Assessment
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud3 targets
IRM-RP-1Risk Identification
IRM-RP-2Risk Analysis and Evaluation
IRM-SR-1Strategic Risk Assessment
PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security
IRM-OR-3Supply Chain and Technology Risk

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) has 48 controls across its framework, while IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 16 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

Of 48 total South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls, 6 map directly to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

42 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct equivalent in IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.