Cross-Framework Mapping

Solvency IIvsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)

See exactly how Solvency II controls map to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Solvency II maps to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 Solvency II controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Pillar 2: Governance and Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 354K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 354K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Pillar 2: Governance and Risk Management(4 mappings)

SII-P2-11Remuneration Policy2 targets
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
ICP-8Risk Management and Internal Controls
SII-P2-12Written Policies2 targets
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
ICP-8Risk Management and Internal Controls

Pillar 3: Reporting and Disclosure(10 mappings)

SII-P3-01Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR)3 targets
ICP-13Reinsurance and Other Forms of Risk Transfer
ICP-15Investment
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
SII-P3-04Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) - Quarterly3 targets
ICP-13Reinsurance and Other Forms of Risk Transfer
ICP-15Investment
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
SII-P3-06SFCR Section B: System of Governance4 targets
ICP-13Reinsurance and Other Forms of Risk Transfer
ICP-15Investment
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
ICP-8Risk Management and Internal Controls

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (354K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Solvency II and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

Solvency II has 43 controls across its framework, while IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Pillar 2: Governance and Risk Management, where 10 Solvency II controls have no direct IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between Solvency II and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

Of 43 total Solvency II controls, 5 map directly to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Solvency II to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

38 Solvency II controls have no direct equivalent in IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Pillar 2: Governance and Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Solvency II and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Pillar 2: Governance and Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.