Cross-Framework Mapping

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)vsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)

See exactly how New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls map to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) maps to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Security Controls(5 mappings)

NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
ICP-1Objectives, Powers and Responsibilities of the Supervisor
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management2 targets
ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
ICP-8Risk Management and Internal Controls
NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
ICP-24Macroprudential Surveillance and Insurance Supervision
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
ICP-25Supervisory Cooperation and Coordination

Related Comparisons

Other New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) comparisons

Other IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 726 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) has 44 controls across its framework, while IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 17 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

Of 44 total New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls, 4 map directly to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

40 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct equivalent in IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.