TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management ExaminationvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SOC for Cybersecurity: Description Criteria.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

SOC for Cybersecurity: Availability Criteria(2 mappings)

SOC-CY-A2Disaster Recovery2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

SOC for Cybersecurity: Confidentiality Criteria(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

SOC for Cybersecurity: Description Criteria(7 mappings)

SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

SOC for Cybersecurity: Security Criteria(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
SOC-CY-S2System Operations2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
Coverage crosswalk

A SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls your existing SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 36% in the header counts how many SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)10 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 59 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)9 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs South Korea ISMS-P9 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs ISO 270198 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.08 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems8 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination has 22 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SOC for Cybersecurity: Description Criteria, where 5 SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 22 total SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

14 SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in SOC for Cybersecurity: Description Criteria with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is SOC for Cybersecurity: Description Criteria (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.