Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

A - Availability(3 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
38500-5.11Viability and performance over time
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
38500-5.11Viability and performance over time
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
38500-5.11Viability and performance over time

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(6 mappings)

SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner3 targets
38500-3Terms and definitions
38500-5.1Purpose
38500-6.1Responsibility principle application
SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures3 targets
38500-3Terms and definitions
38500-5.1Purpose
38500-6.1Responsibility principle application

P - Privacy(3 mappings)

SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
38500-5.10Social responsibility
SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
38500-5.10Social responsibility
SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed
38500-5.10Social responsibility

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 29 SOC 2 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 8 map directly to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT?

46 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.