EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity SectorvsMiFID II / MiFIR
See exactly how EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector controls map to MiFID II / MiFIR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector maps to MiFID II / MiFIR with 32% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Cross-Border Risk Assessment(6 mappings)
General Provisions(11 mappings)
Minimum Cybersecurity Requirements(3 mappings)
+13 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector comparisons
Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector and MiFID II / MiFIR?
EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector has 37 controls across its framework, while MiFID II / MiFIR covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Provisions, where 13 EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector controls have no direct MiFID II / MiFIR equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Of 37 total EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector controls, 13 map directly to MiFID II / MiFIR controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector to MiFID II / MiFIR?
25 EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector controls have no direct equivalent in MiFID II / MiFIR. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Provisions with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector and MiFID II / MiFIR?
The domain with the highest gap count is General Provisions (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.