Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition)vsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics

See exactly how Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) controls map to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

47
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
86%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) maps to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics with 86% coverage across 31 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Internal governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Internal Governance Structures and Measures(6 mappings)

AIGF-1.1Risk Management and Internal Controls4 targets
AIGE-IG-2Define roles and responsibilities for AI oversight
AIGE-IG-3AI ethics policies, standards and code of conduct
AIGE-IG-6Apply risk-based proportionality
AIGE-P6Accountability and Integrity
AIGF-1.2AI Ethics Governance Body
AIGE-IG-1Establish internal AI governance structures and oversight body
AIGF-1.3Data Management
AIGE-OM-2Data quality and representativeness

Determining AI Decision-Making Models(7 mappings)

AIGF-2.1Human-in-the-Loop2 targets
AIGE-HI-3Determine the level of human involvement
AIGE-P4Human-centricity
AIGF-2.2Human-on-the-Loop
AIGE-HI-3Determine the level of human involvement
AIGF-2.3Human-out-of-the-Loop
AIGE-HI-3Determine the level of human involvement
AIGF-2.4Risk-Severity Assessment3 targets
AIGE-HI-1Establish AI objectives and assess against principles and risks
AIGE-HI-2Assess probability and severity of harm
AIGE-HI-4Document risk impact assessments

Operations Management(7 mappings)

AIGF-3.1Minimising Bias in Data2 targets
AIGE-OM-3Bias identification and mitigation
AIGE-P2Fairness and Equity
AIGF-3.2Explainability2 targets
AIGE-OM-5Model explainability
AIGE-P1Transparency and Explainability
AIGF-3.3Repeatability and Traceability2 targets
AIGE-OM-6Repeatability and reproducibility
AIGE-OM-8Traceability and auditability
AIGF-3.4Regular Tuning and Monitoring
AIGE-OM-7Robustness and security testing

+27 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 701 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) comparisons

Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) has 36 controls across its framework, while ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 31 overlapping controls (86% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Internal governance, where 2 Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) controls have no direct ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

Of 36 total Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) controls, 31 map directly to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls — representing 86% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

5 Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) controls have no direct equivalent in ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. The highest concentration of gaps is in Internal governance with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

The domain with the highest gap count is Internal governance (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.