Cross-Framework Mapping

Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)vsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)

See exactly how Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls map to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) maps to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) with 45% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

II — Principles(3 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
Art. 17Governance Structure
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

I — Basic Provisions(4 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art. 4Participating Institutions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

III — Rights of Data Subjects(12 mappings)

Art. 21Administrative Sanctions2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing4 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
Art. 29Safety Measures2 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
Art. 30Privacy Policy4 targets
BOSE-9Civil Penalties for Non-Reporting
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-03Penalties

IV — Controller and Processor(1 mappings)

Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) has 29 controls across its framework, while Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties, where 3 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls have no direct Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) equivalent.

How many controls map between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

Of 29 total Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls, 13 map directly to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

16 Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR). The highest concentration of gaps is in VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is VII — Remedies, Liability and Penalties (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.