TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure RulesvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 21% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management and Strategy (Regulation S-K Item 106(b))(3 mappings)

SEC-106b-1Risk Management Processes3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements

Governance (Regulation S-K Item 106(c))(2 mappings)

SEC-106c-3Management's Role in Cybersecurity2 targets
→NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing
→NIST800-SI-2Flaw remediation

Foreign Private Issuers(3 mappings)

SEC-FPI-1Annual Report Disclosure (Form 20-F)3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements

Related Comparisons

Other SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules comparisons

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20243 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)3 mappingsSEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs EU Digital Markets Act3 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 536 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 172 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05), where 5 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 14 total SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

11 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.