SASB StandardsvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how SASB Standards controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SASB Standards maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 50% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 SASB Standards controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Assurance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Business Model and Innovation(4 mappings)
Leadership and Governance(3 mappings)
Social Capital(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other SASB Standards comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SASB Standards and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
SASB Standards has 6 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Assurance, where 1 SASB Standards controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between SASB Standards and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 6 total SASB Standards controls, 3 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SASB Standards to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
3 SASB Standards controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Assurance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SASB Standards and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Assurance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.