Cross-Framework Mapping

RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 44% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section 3 - Charter.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Section 2 - Contact Information(2 mappings)

RFC2350-2.2Communication Channels
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
RFC2350-2.3Public Keys and Encryption
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Section 3 - Charter(4 mappings)

RFC2350-3.1Mission Statement4 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response

Section 4 - Policies(5 mappings)

RFC2350-4.1Types of Incidents and Level of Support2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
RFC2350-4.2Cooperation and Disclosure2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
RFC2350-4.3Communication and Authentication
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management

Section 5 - Services(4 mappings)

RFC2350-5.2Incident Coordination2 targets
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
RFC2350-5.3Incident Resolution2 targets
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) has 18 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section 3 - Charter, where 3 RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 18 total RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls, 8 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

10 RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Section 3 - Charter with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section 3 - Charter (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.