Cross-Framework Mapping

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)vsNSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance

See exactly how Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls map to NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) maps to NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance with 23% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Operations Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management(4 mappings)

EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets
QRCM-1.1Cryptographic Asset Inventory
EU-CRA-08Information classification and labeling
QRCM-1.3Data Classification for Migration
EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures
QRCM-1.1Cryptographic Asset Inventory
EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal
QRCM-1.1Cryptographic Asset Inventory

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Cryptography(9 mappings)

EU-CRA-18Encryption of data in transit3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption
EU-CRA-19Certificate management3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption
EU-CRA-20Key lifecycle management3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption

Related Comparisons

Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons

Other NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance?

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) has 31 controls across its framework, while NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance covers 9 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Operations Security, where 6 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance equivalent.

How many controls map between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance?

Of 31 total Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls, 7 map directly to NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) to NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance?

24 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct equivalent in NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance. The highest concentration of gaps is in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Operations Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and NSA Quantum-Resistant (QR) Cryptography Migration Guidance?

The domain with the highest gap count is EU Cyber Resilience Act: Operations Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.