Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act
See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance, Training, Enforcement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
High-Risk Processing(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons
Other Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act?
Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, Training, Enforcement, where 1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act equivalent.
How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act?
Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 1 map directly to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act?
7 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance, Training, Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) - NAIC Model Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is Governance, Training, Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.