Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsMontana Consumer Data Privacy Act

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
88%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act with 88% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Collection and Notice.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Open Management and Accountability(1 mappings)

AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework
MT-CDPA-Data-Protection-Assessment-MCA-30-14-2815-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AG-InspectionMontana CDPA Data Protection Assessment + MCA 30-14-2815 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AG Inspection

Use and Disclosure(1 mappings)

AUPRV-3APP 6-9 Use/Disclosure, Direct Marketing, Cross-Border, Government Identifiers
MT-CDPA-Processor-Contract-Security-MCA-30-14-2809-30-14-2811-Pseudonymisation-De-IdentificationMontana CDPA Processor + MCA 30-14-2809 + Security + Pseudonymisation + MCA 30-14-2811 + De-Identification

Quality and Security(4 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information4 targets
MT-CDPA-Privacy-Notice-MCA-30-14-2806-Categories-Purposes-Rights-Email-Online-Mechanism-AppealMontana CDPA Privacy Notice + MCA 30-14-2806 + Categories + Purposes + Rights + Online Mechanism + Appeal
MT-CDPA-Scope-SB-384-Gianforte-19-May-2023-Effective-1-October-2024-MCA-30-14-2801-AG-Knudsen-50K-ThresholdMontana CDPA Scope + SB 384 + Gianforte 19 May 2023 + Effective 1 October 2024 + MCA 30-14-2801 + AG Knudsen + 50K Threshold
MT-CDPA-Sensitive-Data-MCA-30-14-2802-Opt-In-Children-13-Parental-Consent-Minors-13-16-Opt-InMontana CDPA Sensitive Data + MCA 30-14-2802 + Affirmative Opt-In + Children Under 13 Parental + Minors 13-16 Opt-In
MT-CDPA-Universal-Opt-Out-Mechanism-1-January-2025-GPC-Global-Privacy-Control-Mandatory-RecognitionMontana CDPA Universal Opt-Out Mechanism + 1 January 2025 + GPC + Global Privacy Control + Mandatory Recognition

Individual Rights(1 mappings)

AUPRV-5APP 12-13 Access and Correction of Personal Information
MT-CDPA-Consumer-Rights-MCA-30-14-2807-Access-Correct-Delete-Portability-Opt-Out-Appeal-AG-ReferralMontana CDPA Consumer Rights + MCA 30-14-2807 + Access + Correct + Delete + Portability + Opt-Out + Appeal + AG Referral

High-Risk Processing(2 mappings)

AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children2 targets
MT-CDPA-Data-Protection-Assessment-MCA-30-14-2815-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AG-InspectionMontana CDPA Data Protection Assessment + MCA 30-14-2815 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AG Inspection
MT-CDPA-Processor-Contract-Security-MCA-30-14-2809-30-14-2811-Pseudonymisation-De-IdentificationMontana CDPA Processor + MCA 30-14-2809 + Security + Pseudonymisation + MCA 30-14-2811 + De-Identification

Breach Response(3 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response3 targets
MT-CDPA-Privacy-Notice-MCA-30-14-2806-Categories-Purposes-Rights-Email-Online-Mechanism-AppealMontana CDPA Privacy Notice + MCA 30-14-2806 + Categories + Purposes + Rights + Online Mechanism + Appeal
MT-CDPA-Scope-SB-384-Gianforte-19-May-2023-Effective-1-October-2024-MCA-30-14-2801-AG-Knudsen-50K-ThresholdMontana CDPA Scope + SB 384 + Gianforte 19 May 2023 + Effective 1 October 2024 + MCA 30-14-2801 + AG Knudsen + 50K Threshold
MT-CDPA-Sensitive-Data-MCA-30-14-2802-Opt-In-Children-13-Parental-Consent-Minors-13-16-Opt-InMontana CDPA Sensitive Data + MCA 30-14-2802 + Affirmative Opt-In + Children Under 13 Parental + Minors 13-16 Opt-In

Governance, Training, Enforcement(2 mappings)

AUPRV-8OAIC Cooperation, Vendor Management, Training, Complaints, Enforcement2 targets
MT-CDPA-Data-Protection-Assessment-MCA-30-14-2815-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AG-InspectionMontana CDPA Data Protection Assessment + MCA 30-14-2815 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AG Inspection
MT-CDPA-Processor-Contract-Security-MCA-30-14-2809-30-14-2811-Pseudonymisation-De-IdentificationMontana CDPA Processor + MCA 30-14-2809 + Security + Pseudonymisation + MCA 30-14-2811 + De-Identification

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Collection and Notice, where 1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 7 map directly to Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act controls — representing 88% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act?

1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Collection and Notice with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Collection and Notice (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.