Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act with 25% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

APA-09Right to data portability
MN-CDPA-09Right to data portability

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Security(16 mappings)

APA-13Encryption of personal data4 targets
MN-CDPA-13Encryption of personal data
MN-CDPA-25Compliance monitoring and auditing
MN-CDPA-26Training and awareness programs
MN-CDPA-28Complaints handling and resolution
APA-15Access control for personal data4 targets
MN-CDPA-15Access control for personal data
MN-CDPA-25Compliance monitoring and auditing
MN-CDPA-26Training and awareness programs
MN-CDPA-28Complaints handling and resolution
APA-16Data breach notification requirements5 targets
MN-CDPA-16Data breach notification requirements
MN-CDPA-17Security incident response procedures
MN-CDPA-25Compliance monitoring and auditing
MN-CDPA-26Training and awareness programs
MN-CDPA-28Complaints handling and resolution
APA-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
MN-CDPA-16Data breach notification requirements
MN-CDPA-17Security incident response procedures
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment
MN-CDPA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Governance(3 mappings)

APA-19Data protection officer designation2 targets
MN-CDPA-19Data protection officer designation
MN-CDPA-21Data protection impact assessments
APA-21Data protection impact assessments
MN-CDPA-19Data protection officer designation

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 726 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 726 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 48 controls across its framework, while Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights, where 6 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Of 48 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 12 map directly to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

36 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.