TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025vsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security

See exactly how OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 maps to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring and Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Prompt Security(2 mappings)

OWASPLLM-1Prompt Injection and System Prompt Leakage (LLM01 + LLM07)2 targets
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Output Quality and Safety(1 mappings)

OWASPLLM-2Improper Output Handling and Misinformation (LLM05 + LLM09)
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Sensitive Information and Privacy(2 mappings)

OWASPLLM-3Sensitive Information Disclosure and Privacy (LLM02)2 targets
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Supply Chain and Vector Database Security(1 mappings)

OWASPLLM-4Supply Chain and Vector/Embedding Weaknesses (LLM03 + LLM08)
→NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification

Agency and Resource Bounds(1 mappings)

OWASPLLM-6Excessive Agency and Unbounded Consumption (LLM06 + LLM10)
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence5 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework5 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs MTCS (Singapore)4 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)4 mappingsOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20224 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring and Testing, where 1 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

Of 8 total OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

3 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring and Testing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring and Testing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.