Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025vsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring and Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Prompt Security(5 mappings)

OWASPLLM-1Prompt Injection and System Prompt Leakage (LLM01 + LLM07)5 targets
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication
ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication

Output Quality and Safety(2 mappings)

OWASPLLM-2Improper Output Handling and Misinformation (LLM05 + LLM09)2 targets
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance

Sensitive Information and Privacy(4 mappings)

OWASPLLM-3Sensitive Information Disclosure and Privacy (LLM02)4 targets
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication
ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication

Supply Chain and Vector Database Security(3 mappings)

OWASPLLM-4Supply Chain and Vector/Embedding Weaknesses (LLM03 + LLM08)3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring

Agency and Resource Bounds(3 mappings)

OWASPLLM-6Excessive Agency and Unbounded Consumption (LLM06 + LLM10)3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and ISO 27001:2022?

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring and Testing, where 1 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 8 total OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls, 5 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 to ISO 27001:2022?

3 OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring and Testing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring and Testing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.