Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP MASVSvsNIST SP 800-88

See exactly how OWASP MASVS controls map to NIST SP 800-88. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
88%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP MASVS maps to NIST SP 800-88 with 88% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP MASVS controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Platform Interaction.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Storage(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data2 targets
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework
NISTSP88-5Media Inventory, Tracking, Chain of Custody, and Sanitization Records

Cryptography(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
NISTSP88-4Cryptographic Erase, Key Management, and Verification of Erase

Authentication and Authorization(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework

Network Communication(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication2 targets
NISTSP88-4Cryptographic Erase, Key Management, and Verification of Erase
NISTSP88-8Cloud-Resident Data, Hosted Storage, and Scope Boundaries

Code Quality and Build(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates
NISTSP88-7Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls

Resilience and Anti-Tampering(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering
NISTSP88-5Media Inventory, Tracking, Chain of Custody, and Sanitization Records

Privacy(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection2 targets
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework
NISTSP88-7Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-88?

OWASP MASVS has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-88 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Platform Interaction, where 1 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct NIST SP 800-88 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-88?

Of 8 total OWASP MASVS controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-88 controls — representing 88% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP MASVS to NIST SP 800-88?

1 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-88. The highest concentration of gaps is in Platform Interaction with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-88?

The domain with the highest gap count is Platform Interaction (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.