Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017vsNIST SP 800-88

See exactly how ISO 27017 controls map to NIST SP 800-88. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017 maps to NIST SP 800-88 with 27% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 27017 controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud-specific.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

ISO 27017: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ISO27017-01Shared responsibility model definition
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework

ISO 27017: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISO27017-06Cloud identity management
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework
ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework
ISO27017-08Privileged access in cloud environments
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework

ISO 27017: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud
NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework
ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NISTSP88-4Cryptographic Erase, Key Management, and Verification of Erase
ISO27017-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NISTSP88-5Media Inventory, Tracking, Chain of Custody, and Sanitization Records

ISO 27017: Cloud Infrastructure Security(1 mappings)

ISO27017-16Virtual network segmentation
NISTSP88-8Cloud-Resident Data, Hosted Storage, and Scope Boundaries

ISO 27017: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

ISO27017-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
NISTSP88-7Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls
ISO27017-23Cloud vulnerability management
NISTSP88-7Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 800-88?

ISO 27017 has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-88 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud-specific, where 7 ISO 27017 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-88 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 800-88?

Of 37 total ISO 27017 controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-88 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017 to NIST SP 800-88?

27 ISO 27017 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-88. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud-specific with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017 and NIST SP 800-88?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud-specific (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.