TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023vsISMAP (Japan)

See exactly how OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls map to ISMAP (Japan). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 maps to ISMAP (Japan) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Testing + Logging + Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Authorization (BOLA/BFLA)(1 mappings)

OWASPAPI-1Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) and BFLA
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Authentication and Tokens(1 mappings)

OWASPAPI-2Broken Authentication and Token Management
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Property-Level Authorization(1 mappings)

OWASPAPI-3Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA)
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Misconfiguration and Secure Design(2 mappings)

OWASPAPI-6Security Misconfiguration and Secure API Design2 targets
→ISMAP-CloudInfrastructure-NetworkSegmentation-Container-Serverless-WorkloadProtection-Hardening-ConfigManagementISMAP Cloud Infrastructure - VPC Network Segmentation + Container/Serverless Security + Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP) + Image/Template Hardening + CIS Benchmarks + Configuration Management + IaC
→ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 comparisons

OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs OWASP Top 10:20254 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)4 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20224 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs FDA 21 CFR Part 114 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs FedRAMP Rev 54 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs FISMA4 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act4 mappingsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 vs HL7 FHIR Security Framework4 mappings

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 and ISMAP (Japan)?

OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISMAP (Japan) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Testing + Logging + Monitoring, where 1 OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls have no direct ISMAP (Japan) equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 and ISMAP (Japan)?

Of 8 total OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls, 4 map directly to ISMAP (Japan) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 to ISMAP (Japan)?

4 OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISMAP (Japan). The highest concentration of gaps is in Testing + Logging + Monitoring with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 and ISMAP (Japan)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Testing + Logging + Monitoring (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.